Thursday, August 30, 2012

Romney's Sister: Romney Administration Would Not Work to End Abortion; “Not His Focus.”

From one of the women who knows Romney best, his sister:
Mitt Romney’s eldest sister, who has backed prominent Democrats for office and is in Tampa showing support for her brother, had some reassuring words Wednesday for women concerned about the Republican Party’s hard line on abortion.

Mitt Romney would never make abortions illegal as president, Jane Romney said when National Journal asked her about the subject after a “Women for Mitt” event. "He’s not going to be touching any of that,” she said. “It’s not his focus.”


But as Jane Romney put it, “Mitt’s much more in the middle” when it comes to abortion.

Mitt Romney has said he supports legal abortion in cases of rape and incest, and when the life of the mother is in danger. As for the fate of abortion rights, “Recognize this is the decision that will be made by the Supreme Court," he said in an interview with CBS News this week. "The Democrats try and make this a political issue every four years, but this is a matter in the courts. It's been settled for some time in the courts."

Jane Romney said she believes “life is sacred” and suggested those seeking abortion should be required to undergo counseling. But she also said that abortion should “absolutely” be safe and legal. “Every woman needs to be left to make her own choice,” she said.

A ban on abortion is “never going to happen” under a Romney administration, Jane Romney said. “Women would take to the streets. Women fought for our choice, we’re not going to go back."

With the way Romney has backed off in the last few days from the pro-life stance he pretended to hold in order to win the GOP primary, does anyone REALLY doubt that Romney's sister is entirely correct in her assessment of him? She's right about Romney. And what's more, we all KNOW that she's right about him.

And, yet, pro-lifers are falling all over themselves to get this guy elected, even going so far as to say that those of us who will not vote for Romney because of his weak position on life are not authentically "pro-life". [NOTE: It was this piece that caused me to drop LifeNews from my Facebook feed.]

I have been saying for years that Romney is a fraud on the pro-life issue, trying to be all things to all people. But when it comes time to fight for anti-Roe judges, or for defunding Planned Parenthood, or for any other controversial right-to-life initiative, does anyone really believe that Romney will go to the mat in the same way the Dems are willing to fight to the death for abortion? Of course not. It is my heartfelt belief that pro-lifers will come to rue the day they ever supported Mitt Romney's bid for the presidency.

And, yet, the pro-life movement continues to make preposterous claims on Romney's behalf. Just stop. It is one thing to say that Obama is just so much worse that supporting Romney is a necessary evil. But pro-lifers just need to stop claiming that there is otherwise a pro-life argument in Romney's favor. There's just not. And, if he's elected, pro-lifers will eventually ask themselves "What were we thinking in supporting this guy?"

Labels: , , , , , , ,


At 9/01/2012 10:59 AM, Blogger t said...

I've gotten fed up with Rebpubots who reflexively vote with any ogre with an R next to its name. They think you're naive or a fanatic you don't want to vote for someone that is, yes, basically pro-abortion and pro-sodomy.

A vote for Mitt Romney is a vote for Mitt Romney, and that isn't a good thing. If I don't vote for Mitt, I'm not 'responsible' for getting Obama elected. That's on the consciences of those sickos who did so. I would be, however, responsible for voting Romney into office...

At least these types could say 'he disgusts and sickens me, but he's a little bit less disgusting than Obama.' Instead some of them pretty much shill for the guy. Stericycle, for example, was spun away like it was nothing, if it wasn't outright ignored. If you accept crap candidates, you will get crap candidates. I'm sick of being strung along by these people with their tokenist pro-life and anti-sodomy talk (the latter seems to be going completely out the window).

A lesser evil isn't a positive good. If you're really going to vote for the guy, at least acknowledge him for what he truly is.


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

hit counter for blogger