Wednesday, October 01, 2008

Bishop Martino of Scranton: "Respect Life"

A pastoral letter from Bishop Joseph Martino of Scranton, PA:
At the direction of the Most Reverend Bishop, this letter is to be read by the celebrant at all Masses of Obligation on Respect Life Weekend, Saturday, October 4, and Sunday, October 5, at the time of and instead of the homily.

Moreover, a copy of the letter should be circulated with all parish bulletins on this same weekend.


***
... It is impossible for me to answer all of the objections to the Church’s teaching on life that we hear every day in the media. Nevertheless, let me address a few. To begin, laws that protect abortion constitute injustice of the worst kind. They rest on several false claims including that there is no certainty regarding when life begins, that there is no certainty about when a fetus becomes a person, and that some human beings may be killed to advance the interests or convenience of others. With regard to the first, reason and science have answered the question. The life of a human being begins at conception. The Church has long taught this simple truth, and science confirms it. Biologists can now show you the delicate and beautiful development of the human embryo in its first days of existence. This is simply a fact that reasonable people accept. Regarding the second, the embryo and the fetus have the potential to do all that an adult person does. Finally, the claim that the human fetus may be sacrificed to the interests or convenience of his mother or someone else is grievously wrong. All three claims have the same result: the weakest and most vulnerable are denied, because of their age, the most basic protection that we demand for ourselves. This is discrimination at its worst, and no person of conscience should support it.

Another argument goes like this: “As wrong as abortion is, I don't think it is the only relevant ‘life’ issue that should be considered when deciding for whom to vote.” This reasoning is sound only if other issues carry the same moral weight as abortion does, such as in the case of euthanasia and destruction of embryos for research purposes. Health care, education, economic security, immigration, and taxes are very important concerns. Neglect of any one of them has dire consequences as the recent financial crisis demonstrates. However, the solutions to problems in these areas do not usually involve a rejection of the sanctity of human life in the way that abortion does. Being “right” on taxes, education, health care, immigration, and the economy fails to make up for the error of disregarding the value of a human life. Consider this: the finest health and education systems, the fairest immigration laws, and the soundest economy do nothing for the child who never sees the light of day. It is a tragic irony that “pro-choice” candidates have come to support homicide – the gravest injustice a society can tolerate – in the name of “social justice.”

Even the Church’s just war theory has moral force because it is grounded in the principle that innocent human life must be protected and defended. Now, a person may, in good faith, misapply just war criteria leading him to mistakenly believe that an unjust war is just, but he or she still knows that innocent human life may not be harmed on purpose. A person who supports permissive abortion laws, however, rejects the truth that innocent human life may never be destroyed. This profound moral failure runs deeper and is more corrupting of the individual, and of the society, than any error in applying just war criteria to particular cases...


[More]

Labels: , , , ,

4 Comments:

At 10/01/2008 12:37 PM, Blogger Tito Edwards said...

Wow! What a wonderful bishop. He is what is sorely needed across most of the dioceses in America.

 
At 10/01/2008 1:06 PM, Blogger James H said...

BY the way Kmiec is talking over at National Catholic Reporter (JOhn Allen Column)that Obama and the Vatican will get along great

 
At 10/01/2008 1:35 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Outstanding statement by the good bishop.

 
At 10/01/2008 1:43 PM, Blogger Pro Ecclesia said...

"BY the way Kmiec is talking over at National Catholic Reporter (JOhn Allen Column)that Obama and the Vatican will get along great

Maybe Kmiec is angling for the appointment as U.S. Ambassador to the Vatican. I hadn't thought of that angle before, but it might explain his sycophancy. I'm betting that should Obama be elected, that will be Kmiec's payoff.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

hit counter for blogger