Wednesday, May 21, 2008

"The Third Time It's Enemy Action."

Readers of this blog know that I have thus far refused to back John McCain. But there's one surefire way to get me to do that, and it's for Obama's sycophants to keep this shite up:
Three Oddly Similar Criticisms of McCain's Military Service

One:
"McCain was a fighter pilot, who dropped laser-guided missiles from 35,000 feet. He was long gone when they hit," Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va. said.

"What happened when they [the missiles] get to the ground? He doesn't know. You have to care about the lives of people. McCain never gets into those issues."
Two:
Republican presidential candidate John McCain's family background as the son and grandson of admirals has given him a worldview shaped by the military, "and he has a hard time thinking beyond that," Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Ia., said Friday.

"I think he's trapped in that," Harkin said in a conference call with Iowa reporters. "Everything is looked at from his life experiences, from always having been in the military, and I think that can be pretty dangerous."

Harkin said that "it's one thing to have been drafted and served, but another thing when you come from generations of military people and that's just how you're steeped, how you've learned, how you've grown up."

"But now McCain is running for a higher office. He's running for commander in chief, and our Constitution says that should be a civilian," Harkin said. "And in some ways, I think it would be nice if that commander in chief had some military background, but I don't know if they need a whole lot."
Three (hat tip, RedState):
A prominent local Barack Obama backer bashed John McCain's military record Monday, calling the Republican presidential candidate a "self-promoter."

In a nearly-half hour speech, Democratic congressional candidate Bill Gillespie praised Obama, his party's leading White House hopeful...

"Admirals' sons," Gillespie said, unopposed for the Democratic nomination in the 1st Congressional District held by Republican Rep. Jack Kingston, "were treated like royalty. They were privileged people. They were given a silver spoon. Their careers were prepared for them."

Gillespie, a former Army officer who served in Iraq, said McCain was the kind of admiral's son who became a "maverick."

McCain, Gillespie added, was "somebody who needed to stand out, someone that needed to draw attention to themselves and ... was usually out for themselves."

He said his "heart grieves" for McCain's suffering as a POW.

"After that," Gillespie said, "he was somewhat of a celebrity and it went to his head. ... I think he was a self-promoter for the last four years (in the Navy.)

Asked to cite specific examples, Gillespie responded, "I don't have one right now."
To quote Auric Goldfinger, "Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time it's enemy action."

Which is worse — that Democrats across the country are spontaneously choosing to cite McCain's military experience as a drawback or weakness, and a reason to not vote for him? Or that this is some sort of coordinated message effort?
Ed Morrisey sees this as some sort of effort to paint McCain as the true elitist in the race rather than Obama:
Now we have at least three Democrats and Obama supporters on the record as attacking McCain’s 24 years of service in the Navy: Gillespie, Jay Rockefeller, and Tom Harkin, as well as unnamed “colleagues” in the Matt Bai hit piece in the New York Times. The criticisms sound remarkably similar; all of them question the quality of his service, claiming that he grew up as a child of privilege and had his career handed to him, in a role where he didn’t know what combat was really like. He had a “silver spoon”, was “Navy royalty”, and so on.

This sounds like someone wants to fight the elitist stink that has attached itself to the Barack Obama campaign through the intrepidity of the candidate himself. Obama scorned middle-America voters as bitterly clinging to guns and God because of a lack of wealth redistribution in America, while his wife told audiences that she only starting taking pride in America when people supported Obama’s bid for the presidency, and his pastor and friend talked about the US government’s creation of the HIV virus as a genocidal tool against people of color. Team Obama has argued ever since that McCain is the real elitist, and not the Harvard-educated man who sat on boards with William Ayers and never knew he had befriended an unrepentant domestic terrorist.

If the Obama campaign wants to continue its denigration of military service, let them. It’s going to be difficult to sell McCain as a man who got a free ride through a distinguished naval career and attempt to turn a real war hero into a dilettante. That effort will reveal the anti-military animus that surrounds Team Obama and its supporters on the hard Left better than any ad the Republicans can produce.
How long would Obama have lasted in the Hanoi Hilton? Probably about a day before he made common cause with his VietCong and NVA comrades and gave them everything they wanted.

Not. Ready. For. Prime. Time.

Labels: , , , ,

4 Comments:

At 5/21/2008 9:52 PM, Blogger Donald R. McClarey said...

Brilliant campaign strategy! Attack John McCain, a true war hero who endured more pain and suffering for America than any man who has ever run for President, because he served his country in the Navy. Yep that will solidify Obama's support with blue collar dems, more than a few of whom served a hitch with Uncle Sam.

 
At 5/21/2008 11:12 PM, Blogger Christopher said...

"But now McCain is running for a higher office. He's running for commander in chief, and our Constitution says that should be a civilian..."

Say what?

This is rich -- first the Democrats tear into President Bush for too little military experience during his campaign. (Remember RatherGate and the forged memos?)

Now they're after McCain for too much.

 
At 5/22/2008 1:33 PM, Blogger Darwin said...

Perhaps there's still hope that Obama will bring on Henry Karlson's "McCain is probably a Manchurian Candidate reprogrammed by the Vietnamese" theory. I would absolutely love to see them run with that one.

 
At 5/23/2008 1:09 PM, Blogger Michelle said...

"...in some ways, I think it would be nice if that commander in chief had some military background..."

But just a little. Just enough to win the military vote, but not enough to have it really shape his/her worldview or to make him/her overly sympathetic with their needs.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

hit counter for blogger