Friday, April 27, 2007

Toledo Blade Editorialist Wants Forcible Dis-Arming of America's Citizenry

From the Toledo Blade:
... Now, how would one disarm the American population? First of all, federal or state laws would need to make it a crime punishable by a $1,000 fine and one year in prison per weapon to possess a firearm. The population would then be given three months to turn in their guns, without penalty.

Hunters would be able to deposit their hunting weapons in a centrally located arsenal, heavily guarded, from which they would be able to withdraw them each hunting season upon presentation of a valid hunting license. The weapons would be required to be redeposited at the end of the season on pain of arrest. When hunters submit a request for their weapons, federal, state, and local checks would be made to establish that they had not been convicted of a violent crime since the last time they withdrew their weapons. In the process, arsenal staff would take at least a quick look at each hunter to try to affirm that he was not obviously unhinged.

It would have to be the case that the term "hunting weapon" did not include anti-tank ordnance, assault weapons, rocket-propelled grenade launchers, or other weapons of war.

All antique or interesting non-hunting weapons would be required to be delivered to a local or regional museum, also to be under strict 24-hour-a-day guard. There they would be on display, if the owner desired, as part of an interesting exhibit of antique American weapons, as family heirlooms from proud wars past or as part of collections.

Gun dealers could continue their work, selling hunting and antique firearms. They would be required to maintain very tight inventories. Any gun sold would be delivered immediately by the dealer to the nearest arsenal or the museum, not to the buyer.

The disarmament process would begin after the initial three-month amnesty. Special squads of police would be formed and trained to carry out the work. Then, on a random basis to permit no advance warning, city blocks and stretches of suburban and rural areas would be cordoned off and searches carried out in every business, dwelling, and empty building. All firearms would be seized. The owners of weapons found in the searches would be prosecuted: $1,000 and one year in prison for each firearm.

Clearly, since such sweeps could not take place all across the country at the same time. But fairly quickly there would begin to be gun-swept, gun-free areas where there should be no firearms. If there were, those carrying them would be subject to quick confiscation and prosecution. On the streets it would be a question of stop-and-search of anyone, even grandma with her walker, with the same penalties for "carrying." ...
(emphasis added)

My Comments:
I really hope this is satire, but somehow I doubt it. Now, the fact that someone in America could think this way is just frightening. And some folks think that it's the conservatives in this nation that are the "fascists".

As someone raised in Texas, and a descendant of those who served in the Texas Revolution, and with some kinfolks currently living in Gonzales, I have only one thing to say to this idiot:

"Come and Take It!"

Labels: , , , , ,

3 Comments:

At 4/27/2007 1:41 PM, Blogger Fidei Defensor said...

I too hope this is satire, if an NRA wrote it, that would be downright brilliant, and a good example of how crazy the anti-gun folks are. Sadly I do think this was by a real beliver and it is downright scary, this is gun control on a level Hitler and Stalin would have dreamed of!

These people fail to take into account that with these sort of laws the good people of America would be completly defenseless against criminals (who would never turn in guns), or against a crazy cop who decided to start gunning people down, to say nothing of a dictator, God forbid.

 
At 4/27/2007 3:03 PM, Blogger Right Wing Toledo said...

Hmmm... I remember an old statement: "A benevolent govenment has nothing to fear from an armed populace." I've always known that the Blade promoted actions against the Second Amendment. Now it seems that they have no problems with "unreasonable search" as well. I wonder, if we changed the word gun to "newspapers and computers" I wonder how the same editors would react? Perhaps, I could be placed in charge of all information - which can be more dangerous than any gun - to be distributed to the general public.

 
At 5/23/2007 8:50 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Special squads of police" of course would be wearing black uniforms and jack boots. If I would be living in the neighborhood in which these squads would be working it would be immediately declared a war zone these squads would have to be equipped with armored vehicles and members of these squads would have to be willing to die as I am willing to die to prevent my forced subjugation to an others political will. My brother died at Virginia Tech only because he was unarmed.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

hit counter for blogger