Thursday, April 12, 2007

Newsweak: "The Missing Pope"

Photo credit: Alessandro Bianchi / Reuters

According to this hit piece by Newsweak [sic], "[Pope] Benedict has been almost invisible in the places he's needed most":
April 16, 2007 issue - April 19 marks the second anniversary of Benedict XVI's election as pontiff, and in a few weeks he heads to Brazil. Not long ago, when a pope traveled to the region it didn't occasion much comment; John Paul II was a globe-trotter who hit Mexico and the Caribbean during his first 100 days. But Benedict, who turns 80 this month, has rarely left home and seems most interested in trying to revive European Catholicism.

On his upcoming trek to the Brazilian town of Aparecida do Norte, he plans to huddle with regional prelates worried about their declining influence, the growth of evangelicals and local moves to legalize gay unions and abortion. The pope should choose his words carefully; on one of his last trips, to his native Germany, he sparked a firestorm when he quoted in passing scathing comments about the Prophet Muhammad. Within days Benedict was being burned in effigy. He can expect a warmer greeting in South America. But there's no denying he's been a disappointment to many faithful there and elsewhere. Some U.S. Catholics condemn him as aloof, Europeans resent his intrusions into their affairs and he's never been popular in Latin America. The region, home to 450 million Catholics, had hoped to see one of its own succeed John Paul. Many there have felt ignored by the man who ultimately did.

Part of the problem is style. The last pope was a former parish priest who recast himself as an international player (he spoke eight languages, including Spanish and Portuguese). Benedict is a colorless academic who spent much of his career teaching theology and philosophy. "This is a professor, a quiet man, not an actor skilled in politics," says the American theologian Michael Novak. "[People] should not judge him by the standards of John Paul II."

Perhaps, but the differences go beyond personality. During his long tenure, John Paul undertook more than 100 trips abroad and showed real concern for the developing world. Although Benedict calls for more aid to Africa in a new book, he seems preoccupied by Europe. His defenders say this narrow focus represents a return to tradition. "Prior to the election of John Paul II, it was understood that the pope played a far more active role in European affairs," argues Friar Thomas Williams of the Legion of Christ.

But Benedict's emphasis hasn't won him many fans. Just before his ascension, the then Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger warned Italians that "Europe has developed a culture that ... excludes God from the public conscience," and last month he decried Europeans' "dangerous individualism." Also last month, Italy's bishops came out against the country's attempt to extend rights to gay and unmarried couples. Such moves have rankled politicians—one parliamentarian has warned Benedict against imposing a "clerical dictatorship" in Italy—and many of the faithful. "Ratzinger is getting too intrusive on [subjects] such as civil rights for unwed couples and is too out of date," says Milanese housewife Maria Novella Dall'Aglio.

***
... underscored just how conservative—and far from the mainstream—Benedict is. That will cause more trouble in the future, especially in Latin countries that already believe he is behind the times. Later this month, the Vatican is expected to permit congregations to celebrate mass in Latin without seeking prior approval. This represents a big step backward: Pope Paul VI abolished the Latin rite in 1969, and relatively few modern Catholics can even recall it. But that doesn't worry Ratzinger. "He's an old-fashioned guy who wants to go back to what [the church] was before," says David Gibson, the author of an acclaimed 2006 biography of the pope.

The problem, according to Gibson, is that Benedict "doesn't seem to realize that he's a world leader and not an academic." Indeed, the pope's great misfortune may be his election to a job he was never suited for. With the Vatican facing an acute shortage of priests and nuns and its moral authority tarnished by child-abuse scandals, the world's 1.1 billion Catholics could use a shepherd who would help them tackle present and future problems. What they've got instead is a reclusive intellectual more interested in resurrecting old rituals and disputes.


[More]
(emphasis added)

My Comments:
So to summarize, Pope Benedict is bad because (1) he isn't JP II, (2) he is trying to revitalize Catholicism in his native Europe where he is, after all, the Bishop of Rome, (3) he said nasty things about Muhammad, (4) American progressive Catholics find him "aloof", (5) he's too "instrusive" on the perogatives of politicos when he teaches what the Church has always taught about abortion, marriage, etc., (6) he didn't go to New Orleans and "feel our pain" after Katrina, (7) he has condemned "liberation theology", (8) he is "conservative ... and far from the mainstream" [i.e. he doesn't just go along with the flow of the culture of death], and finally, (9) it all comes down to Latin - the rumored Motu Proprio, which is "a big step backward".


UPDATE
Be sure to read this keeping in mind Shea's rule of subtracting 50 IQ points whenever the media discusses religion or the Church. In this case, I'd subtract at least 100 points.


UPDATE # 2
Both The Curt Jester ("Newsweek Still Sucks") and Carl Olson ("Truly pathetic, even for Newsweek.") give this Newsweek hit piece the treatment it deserves.

Labels: , , ,

6 Comments:

At 4/12/2007 12:30 PM, Blogger Sissy Willis said...

They project their own mediocrity and irrelevance onto this brilliant, visionary Pope who recognizes the gathering darkness in Europe.

 
At 4/12/2007 8:50 PM, Blogger Mike said...

Personally, I'd really like to hear a Latin mass. :)

But would it really be a step backwards if Parishes started doing Latin masses if everything else is following Vatican II reforms?

 
At 4/13/2007 12:21 AM, Blogger Literacy-chic said...

Why bring New Orleans into it? Is that in the article? It seems a tasteless reference.

 
At 4/13/2007 6:53 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Really? The Latin mass was abolished? Seems to me the person who gave that comment should actually read the Vatican II transcripts and do his homework.

 
At 4/13/2007 8:41 AM, Blogger Pro Ecclesia said...

The whole article is tasteless, not just the author's reference to New Orleans.

 
At 4/13/2007 11:24 AM, Blogger Literacy-chic said...

Yes, granted, the entire article is tasteless. But the New Orleans thing was a particularly low blow--to the Pope and to the city, as it suggests falsely that there was some expectation of this on the part of the residents of the city. Why? Because the city is predominantly (culturally) Catholic? Because JPII once visited there? It's insulting on a few levels, as only a native of N.O. can appreciate, perhaps. The rest is just blatant inaccuracy. This is a little different--false pathos, if you will, at the city's expense.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

hit counter for blogger