Saturday, October 07, 2006

Think You Can Trust the Democrat Party To Get It Right When It Comes to the Military and Veterans?

Michelle Malkin illustrates why you should think again.


(Hat tip: FreeRepublic)

4 Comments:

At 10/08/2006 6:39 AM, Blogger Sir Galen of Bristol said...

I'll comment here because Michelle doesn't take comments.

Aren't there laws against uniformed military or police personnel appearing in campaign advertisements and materials?

My understanding is that if the DNC had pictures of actual uniformed American military people on its website, both the DNC and the people pictured could get into legal trouble.

 
At 10/08/2006 7:39 AM, Blogger Pro Ecclesia said...

So, then, why bother posting a picture of someone in uniform at all, rather than skirting the law by posting a Canadian soldier?

 
At 10/08/2006 3:15 PM, Blogger Jeff Miller said...

This reminds me of when I was in the U.S.S. Midway in the Indian Ocean during the Iranian Hostage Crisis. We had been at set for about 90 days straight when President Carter held a press conference and during it referred to us as "the other carrier." 90 days at sea and we weren't even worth a mention? Though we had fun with it and had shirts printed with that phrase.

Paul,

They could easily get stock photo's of military personnel which would not violate the law. Political campaigns certainly have shown their candidates speaking to groups of military personnel in the past. Even if the law was so strict as to not allow even stock photographs, then it certainly would be a lot smarter to not show someone from the Canadian military.

The whole point is that they wouldn't know the difference.

 
At 10/08/2006 5:40 PM, Blogger Jeff Miller said...

Turns out the photo of the Canadian did come from a stock photo site on the internet. Which pretty much proves that they didn't know it wasn't a picture of our military. They just looked for one that had a face with a dour expressesion

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

hit counter for blogger