UAE Port Deal Brings Charges of "Islamophobia"
It seemed only a matter of time before someone started crying bigotry over the bipartisan effort to keep our ports safe from Islamic terrorists:
(CNSNews.com) - In the United Arab Emirates, the dispute over control of American seaports is being attributed variously to ignorance, election year posturing, and "Islamophobia."My Comments:
[Full story]
That's right. Our peace-loving brothers in the Religion of Peace[TM] have given us absolutely no cause to be afraid.
But, I do find it ironic that Democrats, as Michelle Malkin points out, are suddenly fans of "profiling":
For the past several years, I've been condemned as an "extremist" for advocating nationality profiling -- unapologetically applying stricter scrutiny to terror-sponsoring and terror-sympathizing countries in our entrance, immigration and security policies.And I find it doubly ironic that President Bush - the man who is supposed to be leading this global War on Terror and who is charged with keeping our Nation safe - has finally found a Congressional action that he's willing to veto:
Now, mirabile dictum, some of the same Democrats who have routinely lambasted such profiling are rushing to the floors of Congress and in front of TV cameras espousing these very same policies.
The impetus: the White House's boneheaded insistence on ramming through a $7 billion deal giving United Arab Emirates-owned Dubai Ports World control over significant operations at six major American ports in New York, New Jersey, New Orleans, Baltimore, Philadelphia and Miami.
(CNSNews.com) - President George W. Bush threatened on Tuesday to veto any legislation that would stop the deal for a state-owned Arab company to manage six major United States seaports, stating that the arrangement would not jeopardize U.S. security.And I find it triply ironic that Jimmy Carter has finally found an issue on which he agrees with President Bush:
"After careful review by our government, I believe the transaction ought to go forward," Bush said to reporters traveling with him on Air Force One to Washington, D.C.. He added that if the U.S. Congress passed a law to stop the arrangement, "I'll deal with it with a veto."
President Bush is taking a battering from fellow Republicans, even the governors of New York and Maryland, over the administration's support for a decision that gives an Arab company control of some commercial operations at six major seaports -- including Miami-Dade's.
But he got a boost Monday from an unlikely source, frequent critic and former president Jimmy Carter, who downplayed fears that the deal poses a risk.
"The overall threat to the United States and security, I don't think it exists," Carter said on CNN's The Situation Room. "I'm sure the president's done a good job with his subordinates to make sure this is not a threat."
5 Comments:
As I noted on my blog, if Jimmy Carter is backing the Bush administration on the deal, you just know it has to be bad.
There seems to be quite a bit of opposition from both sides of the aisle for this. Wouldn't it be ironic if Bush's first veto were overridden?
If it happened, Bush would be an ineffective lame duck going forward. He'd also lose any moral authority he has left on the security issue.
It would be a huge boon to the Dems' hopes for taking back Congress.
Actually, those smoking holes in New York, Washington, and Sommerset, PA are the sources of Islamophobia.
I'm still unsure on this. My gut tells me it is a bad idea, but my brain tells me that there is more to this than we are hearing... or less.
My take on this is that businessmen in the UAE who have no involvement in terror support want to make a profit, just like all businessmen everywhere.
I think that their failure to do more to defeat terrorism should be held against them in this case.
What a mess! And it just keeps getting worse.
Post a Comment
<< Home