Supreme Court Overturns Decision Barring Wisconsin Anti-Abortion Ads
Great news from the Supreme Court yesterday:
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court said Monday that a lower court should take a new look at a challenge to federal restrictions on political advertisements, delaying a major ruling on the constitutionality of ad limits until after this year's elections.My Comments:
Justices could have used the case, brought by an anti-abortion group, to spell out when so-called grass-roots ads are allowed at election time.
Without dealing with that issue, the court overturned a decision that barred Wisconsin Right to Life from broadcasting ads that mentioned a senator during his 2004 re-election campaign.
In an unsigned opinion, justices said that the Supreme Court's 2003 ruling upholding a federal campaign finance law left the door open for future challenges that the law, in practice, violated free-speech rights.
"This could be an important first step toward undermining (the 2003 ruling) without overruling it," said Richard Hasen, an election law expert at Loyola Law School.
[More]
Wow! This one's like a double-stuff Oreo. A pro-life victory coupled with a victory for the 1st Amendment against the pernicious McCain-Feingold law.
2 Comments:
A pro-life victory coupled with a victory for the 1st Amendment against the pernicious McCain-Feingold law.
Isn't victory a bit strong here? This was, after all, another unanimous kicking the can down the road.
I will count the fact that the Court has opened the door to additional challenges to McCain-Feingold, despite its horrendous decision in McConnell, as something of a short-term victory.
Of course, in the long-term, McConnell must be reversed or at least seriously eroded for any kind of victory to be complete.
Post a Comment
<< Home