Father Neuhaus: Jesuit Magazine America Misses the Point
Father Richard John Neuhaus notes that the editors of America, the official publication of the Jesuits, seem to have completely missed the point of Rome's recent instruction on homosexuals in the preisthood:
The editorial response in America pointedly does not affirm the Church’s teaching on homosexuality. It does emphasize the number of “excellent priests” who are “gay,” and caution against animosity toward them and other gays. Then there is this:My Comments:There is a valid concern that the priesthood should not become exclusively or even predominantly the domain of gay men. In the same way that one would not want to see all or most priests coming from a particular ethnic group, or from a particular region of a country, one hopes that the priesthood reflects the great diversity of Catholics.
So the response of the official magazine of the Society of Jesus in the U.S. would seem to be that homosexuality is no more morally problematic than one’s ethnic identity or geographical origins, and that there should be room in the priesthood also for men who are not gay. Rome says gay men should not be admitted to the priesthood. The Society of Jesus, insofar as it is represented by America, responds that men who are not gay should not be excluded from the priesthood. There would appear to be a problem here.
If you think that's bad, there's no telling how the America crowd is likely to misconstrue a Papal encyclical dealing with eros entitled "God is Love".
1 Comments:
The Jesuits have been missing the mark for at least the last twenty years, in my opinion. They have taken the position they have because many of them, at least in the California province, are homosexuals. Back in the 1980s and early 1990s several hundred of them died of AIDS, so you know they weren't being celibate. How embarrassing! Men with a vocation to the ordained priesthood and a desire for orthodoxy and service to Christ go elsewhere, just as at least 5 or 6 of my male friends did. This also happens to be the reason why the Jesuit order is now a dying order. More Jesuits are now dying than are being ordained as new priests. This isn't something that the mere election of a new Father General - something which is now in the offing - will be able to "fix", just as the replacement of Arrupe with Kovenbach fixed anything years ago. What is needed is real reform within the Jesuit order. If that is even still possible.
Post a Comment
<< Home