Saturday, October 29, 2005

After Miers, The Right Is Expecting More

From the New York Times:
In his two choices for the Supreme Court so far, President Bush has tapped what some conservatives called "stealth" nominees: jurists without a clear record of legal opinions on abortion rights or other contentious social issues.

But with the announcement of a third nominee to succeed Justice Sandra Day O'Connor expected as early as Monday, prominent conservatives said they were confident that this time would be different. They argued that the reaction against the nomination of Harriet E. Miers had proven the perils of such an approach, even though some also acknowledged that the failure of the Miers nomination may have weakened the president if the next nominee sets off a battle.

"To the degree that Bush was enamored of a stealth strategy, I have got to believe he has learned there is a real downside," said William Kristol, editor of The Weekly Standard and one of the first conservative thinkers to call for withdrawal of the Miers nomination.

But if the next nominee provokes a fight with the left instead, Mr. Kristol added, "it is tougher having made a mistake with Miers."


[More]
My Comments:
All I expect is that we don't run away from what we claim to believe in.

The "stealth" strategy gives the impression that those of us who believe that the text of the Constitution actually means something need to be ashamed for holding that view.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

hit counter for blogger