Wednesday, July 27, 2005

Durbin Was Source For Turley Column About Roberts

From the Washington Times:
Senate Minority Whip Richard J. Durbin acknowledged yesterday that he was the source for a newspaper column that reported earlier this week that Judge John G. Roberts Jr. said he could not rule in a Supreme Court case where U.S. law might conflict with Catholic teaching.

But the Illinois Democrat maintains that the column by George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley incorrectly captured the private conversation that the senator had with Judge Roberts in his Capitol office Friday.

When the column appeared Monday, Mr. Durbin's office clarified that "Judge Roberts said repeatedly that he would follow the rule of law."

Spokesman Joe Shoemaker also said he did not know who Mr. Turley's source was, although only a handful of people were in the room at the time.

"Whoever the source was either got it wrong or Jonathan Turley got it wrong," Mr. Shoemaker said Monday.

Yesterday, Mr. Shoemaker said the source was Mr. Durbin.

***
Mr. Turley said that after he wrote the Judge Roberts column, he read back portions of it to Mr. Shoemaker, whom, he said, verified the account. Mr. Shoemaker declined to comment further.

Conservatives accused Mr. Durbin -- who is Catholic
[ED: they at least should have put "Catholic" in square quotes when referring to Durbin's alleged religious affiliation] -- of having a religious "litmus test" under which he would oppose any nominee to the high court who is Catholic and follows the church's teaching on abortion.

Connie Mackey, vice president of the conservative Family Research Council, wrote Mr. Durbin a letter yesterday asking him to clarify his position on the matter.

"It has been our concern over the past few years that one who is orthodox in their religion, whether it is Catholic, Protestant, Jewish or any other denomination, will be discouraged from seeking a position on the court or for that matter that a chilling effect is being placed upon anyone seeking public office who is devout," Mrs. Mackey wrote. "It is the intention of the Family Research Council to encourage legislators not to pit nominees' faith against their fitness for public office."

1 Comments:

At 7/28/2005 1:32 PM, Blogger Pro Ecclesia said...

"I really don't think you want that kind of thing to be the standard practice for a daily newspaper, Jay. I really don't."

Victor, I agree that newspapers generally shouldn't make those judgment calls (an exception would be the Reuters caption that identified newly "ordained" priestesses as "Catholic priests" without any editorial comment that the Church doesn't recognize their ordinations).

I was being tongue in cheek about the paper inclucing scare quotes around "Catholic" in reference to Durbin. Newspaper editors don't need to make those judgment calls as long as there is a blogosphere to do it for them.
;)

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

hit counter for blogger