Wednesday, April 18, 2007

Supreme Court Backs Ban on Abortion Procedure

(Hat tip: Dale Price)

Thanks be to God:
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court upheld the nationwide ban on a controversial abortion procedure Wednesday, handing abortion opponents the long- awaited victory they expected from a more conservative bench.

The 5-4 ruling said the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act that Congress passed and President Bush signed into law in 2003 does not violate a woman's constitutional right to an abortion.

The opponents of the act "have not demonstrated that the Act would be unconstitutional in a large fraction of relevant cases," Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in the majority opinion.

The decision pitted the court's conservatives against its liberals, with President Bush's two appointees, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, siding with the majority.

Justices Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia also were in the majority.

It was the first time the court banned a specific procedure in a case over how—not whether—to perform an abortion.


[More]
My Comments:
I despise Anthony Kennedy a little less today.


UPDATE
ConfirmThem has more on the ruling, including this from Justice Thomas' concurring opinion:
"I write separately to reiterate my view that the Court's abortion jurisprudence, including Casey and Roe v. Wade, has no basis in the Constitution."
(Hat tip: Publius)


UPDATE #2
Professor Rick Garnett offers his initial take on the decision at Mirror of Justice. (Hat tip: Amy Welborn)


UPDATE #3
Dale Price notes a key distinction between a Bush victory and a Kerry victory in 2004. (Please note which of the two candidates in that election calls himself a Catholic.)

Labels: , , , ,

2 Comments:

At 4/18/2007 12:23 PM, Blogger Rick Lugari said...

I write separately to reiterate my view that the Court's abortion jurisprudence, including Casey and Roe v. Wade, has no basis in the Constitution.

Proving once again that not only is Justice Thomas respectable as a man and a jurist, he is overflowing with integrity. And at this moment, as I consider what he has just done by issuing that statement along side his already majority opinion I am scanning my mind wondering if I am aware of anyone in our government or political sphere of matched integrity of character and willingness to put it out there as a matter of conscience and moral influence. God bless him.

 
At 4/18/2007 3:02 PM, Blogger Rick Lugari said...

Oooh, and skimming through the actual decision I see Justice Scalia joined Thomas in that statement.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

hit counter for blogger